4 ms·
But it's intrusive as hell. It takes me out of the world of the TV show and kills the immersion. I would much prefer, for instance, just watching a five-minut
by veridies 14y ago
But it's intrusive as hell. It takes me out of the world of the TV show and kills the immersion.
I would much prefer, for instance, just watching a five-minute short film / ad at the beginning and then getting to watch the whole show.
- freehunter 14y agoWhen shows are set up for commercials, it makes it a lot better. Leaving for a few minutes on a cliffhanger builds suspense. It's quite jarring when a show designed around commercials suddenly has none (like on DVD). You see a cliffhanger come up, it fades to black for one second, then it's right back with the resolution. At that point, the resolution isn't as satisfying since you didn't have to wait for it.
- neotek 14y agoThe problem is you're much less likely to engage with or take notice of a five minute ad at the beginning of a show, you'll get up and make a cup of tea or browse HN in the background while you wait. There's also not much an advertiser can say in five minutes that they can't say in 30 seconds.
- alttab 14y agoWhat seems "intrusive as hell" is the attitude that these guys bend over backwards to give you a better experience than Cable TV and you still complain about it. So you want everything you want, when you want it, for free? I'll buy you a train ticket to reality so you can join the rest of us.
- veridies 14y agoA bit late, but... I actually pay for Netflix. It's a great, simple experience. I paid for Hulu Plus too for a month, and found the commercials unbearable (especially since, on my connection, it would stop to buffer whenever it went to commercial or back). I'm not averse to paying. I'm averse to not having an option to pay, and having to resort to commercials.