3 ms·
If it's not acceptable to hallucinate laws for writing legal documents, then writing legal documents is probably an unacceptable use case. Also, how do you mit
by butlike 2y ago
If it's not acceptable to hallucinate laws for writing legal documents, then writing legal documents is probably an unacceptable use case.
Also, how do you mitigate a lawyer writing whatever they want (aka: hallucinating) when writing legal documents? Double-checking??
- ToucanLoucan 2y agoA licensing body, and consequences for the failure to practice law correctly.
- scott_w 2y agoLawyers can already be sanctioned for this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqSYljRYDEM&pp=ygUObGVnYWwgZWFnbGUgYWk%3D https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqSYljRYDEM&pp=ygUObGVnYWwgZ...
- PittleyDunkin 2y ago> If it's not acceptable to hallucinate laws for writing legal documents Legislators pass incoherent legislation every day. "hallucination" is the de-facto standard for human behavior (and for law).
- mdp2021 2y ago> Also, how do you mitigate a lawyer writing whatever they want (aka: hallucinating) when writing legal documents? Double-checking?? Of course they are supposed to double and triple and multiple check as they think and write, documentation and references at hand, _exactly_ how you are supposed to do from trivial informal context on towards critical ones - exactly the same, you check the detail and the whole, multiple times.