4 ms·
As the sole arbiter of the true and false interpretations of Nietzsche's writing, its not debatable.
by DiscourseFan 2y ago
As the sole arbiter of the true and false interpretations of Nietzsche's writing, its not debatable.
- _yb2s 2y agoI should have done a better job of adding some caveats to my recommendation of Jung- for example that his perspectives are indeed heavily biased through the lens of his own philosophy, and he mostly ignores things important to Nietzsche that don't relate to his own interests. However, this type of sneering/mocking tone is unbecoming of HN discussions, and goes against the HN community guidelines.
- DiscourseFan 2y agoThat you missed the irony of my comment makes me think the one I was responding too may have been correct about your views on Nietzsche.
- _yb2s 2y agoThey are correct.