3 ms·
> Even “string” is technical jargon. "string of characters" as a concept substantially predates the first computers: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22string+
by Empact 2y ago
> Even “string” is technical jargon.
"string of characters" as a concept substantially predates the first computers: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22string+of+characters%22&lr=lang_en&sca_esv=cd7e98c4db4a6188&sxsrf=ADLYWIKphu56Aa4q7sjMiH3pIlRjiIN_-Q%3A1733382969755&source=lnt&tbs=lr%3Alang_1en%2Ccdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A1%2F1%2F1800%2Ccd_max%3A12%2F31%2F1900&tbm=bks https://www.google.com/search?q=%22string+of+characters%22&l...
- liontwist 2y agoYes, but if you don’t already know programming or a related field you won’t know that. So according to modern naming convention it’s a bad name because of gate keeping, ivory tower, etc along with: thread, kernel, float, register, ascii, etc
- Empact 2y agoWe have to invent domain-specific language when there is no existing term for an important concept. Each of the terms you mention except ascii (which is an acronym) is imbued with contextual meaning: thread of execution, kernel as in essential core, float as in floating point, register is in that which records and reflects. I’m willing to bet I will find similar pre-computer uses if I go looking. Which is to say they represent a different approach than simply making up a word devoid of meaning.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]