3 ms·
This really assumes that money is more important that creative works (or art, heaven forbid) and that less well-off creators should only exist to serve the mark
by salynchnew 2y ago
This really assumes that money is more important that creative works (or art, heaven forbid) and that less well-off creators should only exist to serve the market.
If someone just wants to create something they like, and then own what they created, a big corp or rich jerk could easily bankrupt them through the tax/force them to sell it off.
Some things don't need to exist in the context of a market and markets are often less efficient than folks seem to assume.