3 ms·
> it's super dismissive to think that wont get better over time When did we start thinking this way? That things HAVE to get better and in fact to think otherw
by krainboltgreene 2y ago
> it's super dismissive to think that wont get better over time
When did we start thinking this way? That things HAVE to get better and in fact to think otherwise is very negative? Is HN under a massive hot hand fallacy delusion?
- miltonlost 2y agoLots of people want that AI grift money and need to be pollyanna true believers to convince others that models that don't know truth are useful decision makers
- rjrdi38dbbdb 2y agoHow could creativity in AI not get better? Sure, progress will likely not be linear or without challenges, but we already have the human brain as proof that it is possible.
- fwip 2y agoMountains exist, but that doesn't mean we'll ever build a structure the size of Everest.
- rjrdi38dbbdb 2y agoIf you compare the historical rate of improvements in computing power and algorithms vs rate of improvements in building scale, you'll find one is a whole lot more likely to reach its goal, even if the rate of progress slows significantly.
- krainboltgreene 2y agoThere is absolutely no evidence to suggest one of these is more likely within reach. We at least know how Mt. Everest works.
- krainboltgreene 2y agoYou're saying AI, the parent I'm replying to is talking about ChatGPT. They aren't the same thing.
- whamlastxmas 2y agoChatGPT is a product that exists beyond just LLMs and I do use it synonymously with natural language interface AI
- krainboltgreene 2y agoNo it doesn't and no one else does so you're going to be really confusing in conversations.