That's one definition of armed. What if only one person had had a bat? Two people? When does it become generally described as "armed"? 99.9% of the people had n

That's one definition of armed. What if only one person had had a bat? Two people? When does it become generally described as "armed"? 99.9% of the people had no weapons other than their bodies. 100% of the people didn't have firearms. Saying it's armed and leaving it at that is a bit misleading, don't you think? Also I wouldn't call it interference when clearly Congress is less representative of the people than...the people themselves. However I think this argument won't go anywhere. Clearly the difference between us is that you have a faith in authority that I simply lack. This discussion is really religious in nature and highlights the extent to which different groups of people have diverged in this country. All I can say is, if you had a little more faith in the common people and a little less in authority figures you might have a more optimistic outlook on the upcoming century.