>careful when dealing with generics / operator overloading In C++, you can't overload operators for built-in types and template parameters are normally constra

>careful when dealing with generics / operator overloading In C++, you can't overload operators for built-in types and template parameters are normally constrained: auto f(std::integral auto x) noexcept { return x+x; } But yes, writing C++ templates that work with wide range of types takes some thinking and operator overloading adds to the mental load (or reduces it, when used sparingly and properly). >"Operations on basic types" can now invoke UB They always could. I don't want this conversation to become about Rust vs. C++, I'd gladly use Rust when where is appropriate task. >needs a concrete example to discuss Write a new post when you come up with a bunch of good examples)