4 ms·

Are you saying that we should kick all the poor people off of Youtube?

• vundercind 2y ago
  I'm saying if you provide a service you can't support, stop and make room for someone else to try. Of course they'd rather provide abusive service to hold on to user-share. That's a choice they're making and I'm saying that's a bad choice, socially speaking. Good business choice, I'm sure.
  • bryanlarsen 2y ago
    > stop and make room for someone else to try. In other words, kick everybody off of Youtube.
    • vundercind 2y ago
      If Google'd rather do that than not harm users with no human recourse unless you get the media involved, yes, that would be a more ethical choice than what they're doing now. They could also just stop being bad at the role they've elected to take on, in the first place.