3 ms·
Previously you said authorized (legal). Now you’re changing your argument to illegal. How about you look up how many refugees European nations are paying to ho
by stogot 2y ago
Previously you said authorized (legal). Now you’re changing your argument to illegal.
How about you look up how many refugees European nations are paying to house vs getting emotional and changing the goalposts. I suspect the number is not millions, but this does not include medical care or other humanitarian care.
The GBP/EURO/USD spent is in the billions and the cost was the premise, not necessarily the number of people. If OP exaggerated, correct it and move on to the substance of the argument. It doesn’t make their entire post insipid (your words)
- aguaviva 2y agoPreviously you said authorized (legal). Now you’re changing your argument to illegal. I meant "unauthorized". It was just a typo, honest. How about you look up how many refugees European nations are paying to house It was the conflation of "refugees" with "illegal immigrants" in the commenter's post that I took issue with. The two categories might sound the same but are entirely different. In particular the latter category definitely do not receive subsidized subsidized housing or benefits the way actual legally recognized asylum seekers, aka "refugees" do.