3 ms·
Yep, I'm sure there would be takers of such a product, because such products exist. When I worked in banking, we used Control-M for such things. I have not kept
by codingdave 2y ago
Yep, I'm sure there would be takers of such a product, because such products exist. When I worked in banking, we used Control-M for such things. I have not kept up on similar products in the 20 years since then, but I'm sure more modern competitors exist as well.
- d--b 2y agoWhat I am thinking about is slightly different. A scheduler really only looks at tasks, and the problem with that is that they don't know anything about the data that the tasks operate on. So looking at tasks only doesn't give you a good view of your data flow. I've used schedulers for a long time, but they tend to get really messy as well. But yeah, you're right that people are used to schedulers and they'd probably expect the kinds of features I am thinking of to be in there as well.
- d--b 2y agoIn fact, more modern orchestrating solutions like kubernetes/nomad really focus on the physical aspects of how things run, rather than the logical aspect. A health dashboard for Kubernetes will show you CPU usage, RAM load and network latency, instead of a map of all your database tables being populated or not.