3 ms·
I agree with what you're saying, but I'd also be remiss if I didn't quibble with this bit: > For code evaluation I only have to direct you to the creation
by jashkenas 14y ago
I agree with what you're saying, but I'd also be remiss if I didn't quibble with this bit:
> For code evaluation I only have to direct you to the creation
> of Coffeescript (an entirely evaluated language) whose
> innovations have directly influenced new versions of the
> ECMAScript language.
The standard way to use CoffeeScript is to compile it to JavaScript first, and then deploy and run with that. There's zero "eval()" involved. Or rather, doing direct "eval()" of CoffeeScript is possible, and on occasion fun, but is discouraged for all the usual reasons.