> Why not? I don't know. I could speculate: * The Perl they have is so low maintenance they don't think about it much * Or they're planning to rewrite it

> Why not? I don't know. I could speculate: * The Perl they have is so low maintenance they don't think about it much * Or they're planning to rewrite it but haven't yet got around to it... after more than a decade? * They have nobody working on it that is vocal about it or active in the community/blogsphere/etc * The company policy is to not talk about it * Or talk about any tech they use - think: banks, large enterprise, fintech * Or they're successful enough they don't feel the need to talk about it * They're open source tools or distros that have a mass of other tech so Perl gets ignored even though its practically embedded - Linux distros, git, etc * The Perl is on the periphery, or not the core logic - test suites (memcached for example), used in build systems, pipelines, Make, oneliners, etc There's an argument to be had that Perl's strong backwards compatibility has meant it has sat there working in the background for years (decades in some cases). And, as most of us know, when tech "just works" it doesn't get talked about.