2 ms·
> even operated by people who have no clue how the underlying mechanism functions are still far more empowered than anything like the primitives of the 80s enab
by lm28469 2y ago
> even operated by people who have no clue how the underlying mechanism functions are still far more empowered than anything like the primitives of the 80s enabled.
I'm still not convinced about that. All the """studies""" show 30-60% boost in productivity but clearly this doesn't translate to anything meaningful in real life because no industry laid off 30-60% of their workforce and no industry progressed anywhere close to 30% since chat gpt was released.
It's been released a whole 24 months ago, remember the talks about freeing us from work and curing cancer... Even investments funds which are the biggest suckers for anything profitable are more and more doubtful
- PittleyDunkin 2y ago> All the """studies""" show 30-60% boost in productivity The services that provide serious productivity boosts aren't being heavily used or marketed yet. They: 1. Attempt to do narrow tasks with high proficiency. 2. Replace specific job titles. 3. Are high-value enough to be slower to engage in layoffs. What I'm suggesting is not a fungible solution, but it is one that will be highly profitable and productive.