You're making a load of generous claims for yourself without giving your thought process: > The basic problem is that GPT generates easy poetry > were compari

You're making a load of generous claims for yourself without giving your thought process: > The basic problem is that GPT generates easy poetry > were comparing to difficult human poets What's your qualitative process for measuring "easy" vs. "difficult" poetry? > rating using a bunch of people who don't particuarly like poetry How do you know these people don't like poetry? Maybe they don't seek it out, but certainly poetry is not just for poetry lovers. Good poetry speaks to anyone. > the human Sylvia Plath is objectively better by any possible honest measure Really? Whats your objective measure?