6 ms·
A rough idea of the price differences... Per 1k tokens Input | Output Amazon Nova Micro: $0.000035 | $0.00014 Amazon Nova Lite: $0.00006 | $0
by mikesurowiec 2y ago
A rough idea of the price differences...
Per 1k tokens Input | Output
Amazon Nova Micro: $0.000035 | $0.00014
Amazon Nova Lite: $0.00006 | $0.00024
Amazon Nova Pro: $0.0008 | $0.0032
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: $0.003 | $0.015
Claude 3.5 Haiku: $0.0008 | $0.0004
Claude 3 Opus: $0.015 | $0.075
Source: AWS Bedrock Pricing https://aws.amazon.com/bedrock/pricing/ https://aws.amazon.com/bedrock/pricing/
- Bilal_io 2y agoYou have added another zero for Haiku, its output cost is $0.004
- indigodaddy 2y agoThanks that had confused me when I compared same to Nova Pro
- mikesurowiec 2y agoYou're absolutely right, apologies!
- warkdarrior 2y agoEyeballing it, Nova seems to be 1.5 order of magnitude cheaper than Claude, at all model sizes.
- holub008 2y agoHas anyone found TPM/RPM limits on Nova? Either they aren't limited, or the quotas haven't been published yet: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/general/latest/gr/bedrock.html#limits_bedrock https://docs.aws.amazon.com/general/latest/gr/bedrock.html#l...
- tmpz22 2y agoMaybe they want to gauge demand for a bit first?
- Tepix 2y agoI suggest you give the price per million token as seems to be the standard.
- oblio 2y agoI'm guessing they just copy pasted from the official docs page.
- 8n4vidtmkvmk 2y agoFrom my personal table https://i.imgur.com/WwL9XkG.png https://i.imgur.com/WwL9XkG.png Price is pretty good. I'm assuming 3.72 chars/tok on average though.. couldn't find that # anywhere.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- sheepscreek 2y agoIt’s fascinating that Amazon is investing heavily in Anthropic while simultaneously competing with them.
- panabee 2y agoAmazon is a retailer and strives to offer choice, whether of books or compute services. AWS is the golden goose. If Amazon doesn't tie up Anthropic, AWS customers who need a SOTA LLM will spend on Azure or GCP. Think of Anthropic as the "premium" brand -- say, the Duracell of LLMs. Nova is Amazon's march toward a house brand, Amazon Basics if you will, that minimizes the need for Duracell and slashes cost for customers. Not to mention the potential benefits of improving Alexa, which has inexcusably languished despite popularizing AI services. :Edited for readability
- coredog64 2y agoMinor nit: These days I think Ads has taken over as the golden goose, but that doesn’t diminish the contributions of AWS.
- jazzyjackson 2y agoIs that why Amazon's product search is terrible? Because it's more profitable for them when I scroll through 5 pages of junk than if I can navigate immediately to the thing I want?
- wkat4242 2y agoYes because the sellers of that junk pay them to put it there. And most people give up and buy some of that. If it didn't work they wouldn't do it. Cory Doctorow covered this specific phenomenon in his great article that coined the term enshittification.
- dotBen 2y agoIt’s fascinating that Amazon Web Services have so many overlapping and competing services to achieve the same objective. Efficiency/small footprint was never their approach :D For example, look how many different types of database they offer (many achieve the same objective but different instantiation) https://aws.amazon.com/products/?aws-products-all.sort-by=item.additionalFields.productNameLowercase&aws-products-all.sort-order=asc&awsf.re%3AInvent=*all&awsf.Free%20Tier%20Type=*all&awsf.tech-category=tech-category%23databases https://aws.amazon.com/products/?aws-products-all.sort-by=it...
- Havoc 2y agoDoesn’t look particularly favourable versus deepseek and qwen. Main deepseek is about same price as smallest nova. I guess it depends on how sensitive your data is
- jerrygoyal 2y agodoes anyone know performance benchmark