3 ms·
What if there's no solution that has both equity and survival of the society? I don't think we have any known solution yet. Of course if the society collapses,
by foxglacier 2y ago
What if there's no solution that has both equity and survival of the society? I don't think we have any known solution yet. Of course if the society collapses, the equity goes with it.
By the way, how is women being housewives them at the bottom? Housewives have an equal share of their husbands' income, so they're just as wealthy as men. They also traditionally control what it's spent on. It's just that their job is childcare instead of pushing buttons on a machine. Is the problem that men can choose which kind of machine they'll spend all day pushing buttons on but housewives can't choose their work?
- johnny22 2y agoif that's how you wanna put it, then yes. Women should have the same rights to choose which machine's buttons they push.
- foxglacier 2y agoEven if it leads to the collapse of the society which enables them to have those rights, so future generations are back to sex-discriminatory religious rules? That's the problem. Equal rights seems like it might be a self-destroying culture.
- johnny22 2y agoThat's assuming a lot in a vacuum. Society doesn't actually have to work the way it does, even if you keep (a regulated) capitalism.
- account42 2y agoThey don't get to choose though. Single income households are no longer viable for most people because surprise surprise supply and demand works for wages just as much as for everything else.
- johnny22 2y agoThat's a different problem. A problem, but not this one.