4 ms·

You’re just shifting goalposts. First it’s martial law, then it gets disproven and the response is „ok, but still bad!“. Why not make a correct claim in the fir

You’re just shifting goalposts. First it’s martial law, then it gets disproven and the response is „ok, but still bad!“. Why not make a correct claim in the first place?

anon291 2y ago
Martial law is the imposition of punishments without due process. In no world can one argue that being under the equivalent of house arrest is not a punishment. To impose that punishment carte-blanche on anyone who's traveled domestically is a form of martial law.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago
  > Martial law is the imposition of punishments without due process No it's not. > being under the equivalent of house arrest is not a punishment Where were you? I was in New York City and travelled to Tennesse and California and London and Frankfurt in 2020. I went running every other day.
  - anon291 2y ago
    [flagged]
    - JumpCrisscross 2y ago
      > you'd know I was talking about Australia Buddy, you've been all over the place from SCOTUS to Cape Byron. I know plenty of Australians. With the amount of noise you guys were making online you'd think you'd know you had the freedom of speech.
- echoangle 2y ago
  > Martial law is the imposition of punishments without due process That might be something that happens under martial law but not every occurrence of this is martial law by definition. > In no world can one argue that being under the equivalent of house arrest is not a punishment. Watch me do it: Punishment implies intent to make you reconsider your behavior due to perceived misbehavior. If I lock a dog in a kennel to protect him from a larger dog and forget to let him out for 5 hours afterwards, I wasn’t punishing him at any point. Unless the government did the „house arrest“ to make you suffer (instead of preventing spread of disease, for example), it’s not punishment.

4 ms·

You’re just shifting goalposts. First it’s martial law, then it gets disproven and the response is „ok, but still bad!“. Why not make a correct claim in the fir

by echoangle 2y ago

You’re just shifting goalposts. First it’s martial law, then it gets disproven and the response is „ok, but still bad!“. Why not make a correct claim in the first place?

anon291 2y ago
Martial law is the imposition of punishments without due process. In no world can one argue that being under the equivalent of house arrest is not a punishment. To impose that punishment carte-blanche on anyone who's traveled domestically is a form of martial law.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago
  > Martial law is the imposition of punishments without due process No it's not. > being under the equivalent of house arrest is not a punishment Where were you? I was in New York City and travelled to Tennesse and California and London and Frankfurt in 2020. I went running every other day.
  - anon291 2y ago
    [flagged]
    - JumpCrisscross 2y ago
      > you'd know I was talking about Australia Buddy, you've been all over the place from SCOTUS to Cape Byron. I know plenty of Australians. With the amount of noise you guys were making online you'd think you'd know you had the freedom of speech.
- echoangle 2y ago
  > Martial law is the imposition of punishments without due process That might be something that happens under martial law but not every occurrence of this is martial law by definition. > In no world can one argue that being under the equivalent of house arrest is not a punishment. Watch me do it: Punishment implies intent to make you reconsider your behavior due to perceived misbehavior. If I lock a dog in a kennel to protect him from a larger dog and forget to let him out for 5 hours afterwards, I wasn’t punishing him at any point. Unless the government did the „house arrest“ to make you suffer (instead of preventing spread of disease, for example), it’s not punishment.