4 ms·
> Yes, that's dystopic. Yes, making people do that for 14 days after traveling anywhere in the country is martial law in all but name only. making people isola
by bananapub 2y ago
> Yes, that's dystopic. Yes, making people do that for 14 days after traveling anywhere in the country is martial law in all but name only.
making people isolate after international travel during a global pandemic is not "martial law in all but name". this is an absolutely unhinged thing to think. please get some fresh air and get off Youtube and Rumble.
- anon291 2y agoThis was after domestic travel. It's martial law because your basic freedom of movement within the country was abridged without a trial or legal proceeding or any crime. I don't watch youtube and don't know what rumble is. For those of us not terminally online, just witnessing reality is shocking enough.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> It's martial law because your basic freedom of movement within the country was abridged without a trial or legal proceeding or any crime You're describing a suspension of habeus corpus, not martial law. (And even then, not accurately. Curfews have customarily been enacted for short periods of time without being considered a violation of due process.)
- anon291 2y ago> short periods of time 15 days to slow the spread was widely supported. Then it turned into two years (three years?) and people saw right through it.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> it turned into two years (three years?) and people saw right through it You're still debating the merits of the policy. That's orthogonal to whether it was martial law.