2 ms·
> for server type use cases x86 is most of the time probably still a lot less painful than ARM. This isn't true if Debian is supported. As for the architectur
by heresie-dabord 2y ago
> for server type use cases x86 is most of the time probably still a lot less painful than ARM.
This isn't true if Debian is supported.
As for the architecture per se, we should consider what Apple has accomplished with its switch to ARM.
- ac29 2y agoWith the appropriate license, there is no particular reason Apple's team couldn't have built a good x86 processor. Switching to ARM was a matter of necessity, not due to a superior architecture. Architecture largely doesn't matter these days, just how you implement it and what fabrication you build it with.