No need to just use 80/20 as the split. The article says (on one benchmark) you get 97.3% of the accuracy for 50% of the size. So blindly applying Pareto you g

No need to just use 80/20 as the split. The article says (on one benchmark) you get 97.3% of the accuracy for 50% of the size. So blindly applying Pareto you get (compounding nine times, because why not) 78% of the accuracy for 0.2% of the size. Something tells me that's a little optimistic.