4 ms·
By your definition, super-successful kitsch-meisters like Thomas Kinkade are great artists. That's quite a niche view. In fact art is an overlap of many diffe
by TheOtherHobbes 2y ago
By your definition, super-successful kitsch-meisters like Thomas Kinkade are great artists.
That's quite a niche view.
In fact art is an overlap of many different kinds of markets selling to many different kinds of customers - from people buying phone wallpapers online, to tourists buying souvenirs on holiday, to oligarchs laundering money through prestige purchases.
And many others.
A community gallery is going to intersect with a couple of those, but not all of them. Sustainable funding is a goal, but maximising income isn't.
Financial success doesn't sane wash narcissistic entitlement, of which there is plenty outside of the arts.
- krisoft 2y ago> By your definition, super-successful kitsch-meisters like Thomas Kinkade are great artists. And Vincent van Gogh is not. Or was not a great artist, then he died and become a great artist somehow suddenly after his death. (at least by that definition, which just to make it clear, I don't agree with.)
- specialist 2y agoI'm fine with "remembered somehow" as another useful definition for "a great artist". More cynically: van Gogh was only successfully monetized posthumously.