The claim is around failing fair-use by a substantial portion of the work redistributed for commercial gain at the expense of the rights holder. The "trained o

The claim is around failing fair-use by a substantial portion of the work redistributed for commercial gain at the expense of the rights holder. The "trained on" isn't the law being broken here, that's the scare campaign. If it wins it's just the smoking gun that helps prove the other points easier, you'll still be able to train on anything. But if the portion of some work thought to be there is not actually in the final product (prompt engineering a reproduction by detailed description shouldn't count as that is tracing with words) and it's just some style mix (as most AI engineer's say) then I don't think anything will come of this.