4 ms·
And, sure, why not. Let's have a 100% inheritance tax beyond a maybe a couple million in protected assets. If we want to pretend to have a meritocratic system,
by redwall_hp 2y ago
And, sure, why not. Let's have a 100% inheritance tax beyond a maybe a couple million in protected assets. If we want to pretend to have a meritocratic system, then we can't have that joke of a loophole creating dynastic wealth.
Either we have a system where people earn wealth on merit, or we have a feudal aristocracy with extra steps. It can't be both.