And yet.. there still remains evidence that Aboriginal oral tradition maintained accurate history for 10,000 years. Is it really your point that “literate” cul

And yet.. there still remains evidence that Aboriginal oral tradition maintained accurate history for 10,000 years. Is it really your point that “literate” cultures have a long history of genocide and therefore “oral” traditions are 100% irredeemably inferior? Why is it so hard for you to admit that there may — possibly —- somehow —- be tradeoffs between the two? One thing can be better overall than an other thing even as that other thing has unique merits of its own. I am under the impression that one could not get far as a provable liar in a society rooted oral tradition. Compare and contrast that with the success rate of liars in every field of endeavor today.