> What you are doing is looking at the success story and saying 'they already made 100x on their investment that should be enough!' but neglecting to consider t

> What you are doing is looking at the success story and saying 'they already made 100x on their investment that should be enough!' but neglecting to consider the chance of failure. Incorrect. I'm saying that they have a big advantage and they have failed to capitalize on it. > Absolutely Apple should continue to get advantages over non-innovating competitors even though Apple already has gobs of money. The asinine accusation of non-innovation bured in this is worth pointing out, but not worth replying to otherwise. For shame, sir. For shame. But hey, nice try at astroturfing.