>worse for peer review process of Nature. Every scientist will tell you that "peer reviewed" is not a mark of quality, correctness, impact, value, accuracy, wh

>worse for peer review process of Nature. Every scientist will tell you that "peer reviewed" is not a mark of quality, correctness, impact, value, accuracy, whatever. Scientists care about replication. More correctly, they care that your work can be built upon. THAT is evidence of good science.