3 ms·
I'm not in the industry but from what I gather, i agree with you 100%. Bloomberg published an article on the matter though, but it seems they are reporting that
by 7speter 2y ago
I'm not in the industry but from what I gather, i agree with you 100%. Bloomberg published an article on the matter though, but it seems they are reporting that Gelsinger was pushed out by a frustrated board because of "slow progress." This is a real head scratcher to me, even as someone looking in:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-12-02/intel-ceo-pat-gelsinger-retires-amid-chipmaker-s-turnaround-plan?srnd=homepage-europe&leadSource=reddit_wall https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-12-02/intel-ceo...
- Aromasin 2y agoGelsinger always said this was a 5-year plan, yet the board jettisons him at 4 just as IFS customers are starting to ramp up, the 18A node is close to readiness - the company's saving grace at this point - with Panther Lake on the horizon and Altera preparing for IPO in 2026 which should be a relatively good cash injection with PE investors already negotiating stakes. Maybe I just don't have the whole picture, but it seems poorly timed. I hate the idea that the board might do this just as Intel's prospects start looking up after years of cost-cutting measures to bring the company back to profitability and take credit for a "miraculous turnaround" that was actually instigated 4 years prior by the same person they sacked. It's like an incoming political party coming in and within a couple of months of office taking credit for a good economy that they had no hand in creating.