3 ms·
>The only stupid thing they did was not getting into GPUs earlier Intel has been "getting into" GPUs for two decades now going back to Larrabee. They are just
by bubblethink 2y ago
>The only stupid thing they did was not getting into GPUs earlier
Intel has been "getting into" GPUs for two decades now going back to Larrabee. They are just not good at it.
- JohnBooty 2y agoWhat is holding Intel back, there? Engineering chops? AMD and nVidia already patented too much of the good stuff? Too much existing code optimized for AMD and nVidia quirks?
- mewse-hn 2y agoExtreme outsider perspective but they seemed like dilettantes. They'd dip their toe into doing GPUs and then cancel the project every couple years. A few weeks ago Gelsinger even commented he saw "less need for discrete graphics in the market going forward" - just seemed like a very Intel thing to say
- JohnBooty 2y agoAs a fellow outsider, that makes a lot of sense to me. Even if Intel started outperforming nVidia today... who would want to put serious effort into making their stuff work with Intel hardware in a market they're likely to pull out of at any moment?
- bubblethink 2y agoThe early stuff (Larabee, KNL, KNC etc.) was hamstrung by x86. Wrong architecture for the types of things GPUs are good at. Their igpus have generally been good but that's not competing in the compute segment. Then they acquired a few startups (Nervana, Habana) that didn't really work out either. And now they finally have a discrete GPU lineup that is making slow progress. We'll see.