3 ms·

Just for argument, if we set the limit at 25 years. The Fellowship of the Ring, published 29 July 1954, would have been out of copyright by 1981. (https://en.wi

Just for argument, if we set the limit at 25 years. The Fellowship of the Ring, published 29 July 1954, would have been out of copyright by 1981. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fellowship_of_the_Ring https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fellowship_of_the_Ring) I would say that the bulk of the (for lack of a better term) fandom, occurred after the 1980. Frodo Lives!(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frodo_Lives https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frodo_Lives!) notwithstanding. I would also argue that corporations would have no qualms of waiting 25 years to capitalize and format shift a work of art, where as the 50 year term limit makes it more difficult for them to play off of nostalgia alone.

coldtea 2y ago
>Just for argument, if we set the limit at 25 years. The Fellowship of the Ring, published 29 July 1954, would have been out of copyright by 1981. I would say that the bulk of the (for lack of a better term) fandom, occurred after the 1980. So? Tolkien after all died in 1973. The fandom would exist even without copyright past 1981. >I would also argue that corporations would have no qualms of waiting 25 years to capitalize and format shift a work of art, where as the 50 year term limit makes it more difficult for them to play off of nostalgia alone. What would waiting for 25 years achieve? And what is "format shift" this context? "The book is copyright free, but the movie coming out after the book's 25 years is not"? Wouldn't that be an improvement over today which neither is?