Delay is good. Delay is necessary. While we have (some bricks of) the technology to generate/store/consume energy without emitting CO2, we haven't nearly rolled

Delay is good. Delay is necessary. While we have (some bricks of) the technology to generate/store/consume energy without emitting CO2, we haven't nearly rolled it out and we need time to do so. So, yes, by all means, any month we win by decreasing energy usage might save countless lives. > The conflation of supposed moral virtues versus actual, practical solutions is a huge problem with messaging in this space: there are a lot of people who don't see climate change as a problem to be solved, but as the stepping stone to bringing down capitalism or some other goal they want to use it as a bandwagon for. Fair point.