4 ms·
> "Strongly typed" is not a well defined term True. But it has boundaries. Strongly typed cannot be used for langs with implicit nulls. You need to do better t
by cies 2y ago
> "Strongly typed" is not a well defined term
True. But it has boundaries. Strongly typed cannot be used for langs with implicit nulls. You need to do better than stock C, C++, Java or Go to be able to use the term.
Rust, Elm, Haskell, Kotlin and OCaml come to mind.
- lolinder 2y agoNo, that's also entirely subjective. You feel that way, others don't.
- lelanthran 2y ago> True. But it has boundaries. Strongly typed cannot be used for langs with implicit nulls. You need to do better than stock C, C++, Java or Go to be able to use the term. That's, frankly, an insane boundary. According to you, all mainstream languages are untyped? Seriously?