3 ms·
I don't think you necessarily disagree with the definition. You mentioned "Sometimes", while they explicitly said "overconsumption". Most things are ok in moder
by viraptor 2y ago
I don't think you necessarily disagree with the definition. You mentioned "Sometimes", while they explicitly said "overconsumption". Most things are ok in moderation, including stupid relaxing.
- automatic6131 2y ago>Most things are ok in moderation, including stupid relaxing For real. Sometimes, I think that the binary nature of language, things are either good or bad, there is no single word to describe n-shape dose responses except in aphorisms like "too much of a good thing", means that it's too easy to autopilot into thing A is either good for you, or bad for you. One beer with friends is good for you but ten is not. The optimal amount is somewhere between (it's slightly less than 2).
- SebastianKra 2y agoI think what the definition fails to capture is the addiction-like behavior that this specific kind of content can induce. You feel yourself getting more tired and frustrated by the minute, yet you don't stop.
- lupusreal 2y agoIts a definition, not an encyclopedia article or something. The definition of alcoholism probably doesn't go into the ways people fall into alcoholism either.