5 ms·

For those curious like me, here are the Wikipedia entries for David Mayer > David Mayer may refer to: (A) David Mayer (historian) (1928–2023), American-British

For those curious like me, here are the Wikipedia entries for David Mayer > David Mayer may refer to: (A) David Mayer (historian) (1928–2023), American-British theatre historian (B) David Mayer de Rothschild (born 1978), British adventurer, ecologist, and environmentalist (C) David R. Mayer (born 1967), American politician Akhmed Chatayev (D) David Mayer (1980–2017), Chechen Islamist and terrorist source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Mayer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Mayer

bArray 2y ago
[flagged]
- addicted 2y ago
  Wouldn’t the shadowy all powerful cabal simply have ChatGPT respond with an answer about any of the other 3 David Mayer’s? But I guess anti-semitism is too much fun to not engage in.
  - krapp 2y ago
    Or, you know, actually censor the name "Rothschild" or references to the Rothschild family, which it doesn't. I guess the shadowy all powerful cabal didn't think of that.
    - bArray 2y ago
      > Or, you know, actually censor the name "Rothschild" or references to the Rothschild family, which it doesn't. I guess the shadowy all powerful cabal didn't think of that. It depends what you are trying to sensor. Saying something like "The Rothschild family control everything and are lizard people" can be laughed off, but something closer to reality could be very sensitive. It doesn't need to be a massive conspiracy theory either, it could just be something like a medical condition leaked online. If you think this kind of stuff doesn't happen, the Royal Family of the UK are quite open about it [0]. The law literally does not apply to them [1]. They go to a lot of effort to hide their wealth and financial matters [2]. [0] https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/mountbatten-diaries-blocked-southampton-university-royal-family/ https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/mountbatten-diaries-blocked... [1] https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn05377/ https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn05... [2] https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/apr/05/how-the-british-royal-family-hides-its-wealth-from-public-scrutiny https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/apr/05/how-the-brit...
  - bArray 2y ago
    > Wouldn’t the shadowy all powerful cabal simply have ChatGPT respond with an answer about any of the other 3 David Mayer’s? Based on the assumption that the network produces something untrue/compromising about David Mayer: Re-training an LLM is exceptionally computationally heavy, not to mention time consuming, even if they could find the data that caused it to train this way. There is no guarantee it would unlearn this either. What they likely mostly do is build upon already trained models. If the threat to chatGPT is great enough (legal, financial, etc), it is far easier to filter the output. It would look a lot like this. Even when you try to trick the model, when the output tokens match it cuts off. > But I guess anti-semitism is too much fun to not engage in. This has nothing to do with anti-semitism. We're talking about a family with more wealth than most nation states. I'm not commenting on why or how, but it is simply a factual statement.

bArray 2y ago

[flagged]

addicted 2y ago
Wouldn’t the shadowy all powerful cabal simply have ChatGPT respond with an answer about any of the other 3 David Mayer’s? But I guess anti-semitism is too much fun to not engage in.
- krapp 2y ago
  Or, you know, actually censor the name "Rothschild" or references to the Rothschild family, which it doesn't. I guess the shadowy all powerful cabal didn't think of that.
  - bArray 2y ago
    > Or, you know, actually censor the name "Rothschild" or references to the Rothschild family, which it doesn't. I guess the shadowy all powerful cabal didn't think of that. It depends what you are trying to sensor. Saying something like "The Rothschild family control everything and are lizard people" can be laughed off, but something closer to reality could be very sensitive. It doesn't need to be a massive conspiracy theory either, it could just be something like a medical condition leaked online. If you think this kind of stuff doesn't happen, the Royal Family of the UK are quite open about it [0]. The law literally does not apply to them [1]. They go to a lot of effort to hide their wealth and financial matters [2]. [0] https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/mountbatten-diaries-blocked-southampton-university-royal-family/ https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/mountbatten-diaries-blocked... [1] https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn05377/ https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn05... [2] https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/apr/05/how-the-british-royal-family-hides-its-wealth-from-public-scrutiny https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/apr/05/how-the-brit...
- bArray 2y ago
  > Wouldn’t the shadowy all powerful cabal simply have ChatGPT respond with an answer about any of the other 3 David Mayer’s? Based on the assumption that the network produces something untrue/compromising about David Mayer: Re-training an LLM is exceptionally computationally heavy, not to mention time consuming, even if they could find the data that caused it to train this way. There is no guarantee it would unlearn this either. What they likely mostly do is build upon already trained models. If the threat to chatGPT is great enough (legal, financial, etc), it is far easier to filter the output. It would look a lot like this. Even when you try to trick the model, when the output tokens match it cuts off. > But I guess anti-semitism is too much fun to not engage in. This has nothing to do with anti-semitism. We're talking about a family with more wealth than most nation states. I'm not commenting on why or how, but it is simply a factual statement.