4 ms·

This is definitely some ChatGPT output being posted here and your post history also has a lot of this "While X, Y also does Z. Y already overlaps with X" output

This is definitely some ChatGPT output being posted here and your post history also has a lot of this "While X, Y also does Z. Y already overlaps with X" output. I'd like to see your breakdowns as well, given that the cost difference between a 2 vCPU, 4GB configuration (as an example) and a similar configuration on AWS is priced much higher. There's also https://github.com/kube-hetzner/terraform-hcloud-kube-hetzner https://github.com/kube-hetzner/terraform-hcloud-kube-hetzne... to reduce the operational burden that you speak of.

deleted 2y ago
[deleted]
0xFF0123 2y ago
While I agree that your characterisation is true for a lot of chatgpt output, it can also be true for a human explaining their nuanced point of view.
- ratg13 2y ago
  Most humans don't say a couple sentences and then re-summarize them 3 more times unless they are speaking to someone with a learning disability.
tutfbhuf 2y ago
It is my ouput, but I use ChatGPT to fix my spelling and grammar. Maybe my prompt for that should be refined in order to not alter the wording too much.
- redbell 2y ago
  While using ChatGPT for enhancing your writings is not wrong by any means, reviewing the generated output and re-editing when necessary is essential to avoid robotic writing style that may smell unhuman. For instance, these successive paragraphs: "In contrast, using AWS.." and "In essence, with AWS.." leaves a bad taste in your brain when read consecutively.
  - tutfbhuf 2y ago
    I agree with you, failed on that one
- lproven 2y ago
  > I use ChatGPT to fix my spelling and grammar I have a better suggestion, which will save time, energy, money, and human work. Don't. Write it yourself. If you can't, don't post.
  - simtel20 2y ago
    Why would you want to restrict contributions from people with relevant experience and willingness to share, just because the author ran a spelling and grammar check?
    - supriyo-biswas 2y ago
      Everyone claims it’s a spelling and grammar check, but it’s the OP trying to spread “we tried running self-managed clusters on Hetzner and it only saved us 20% while being a chore in terms of upkeep” into a full essay that causes all that annoying filler. You’d assume people would use tools to deliver a better and well composed message; whereas most people try to use LLMs to decompress their text into an inefficient representation. Why this is I have no idea, but I’d rather have the raw unfiltered thought from a fellow human rather than someone trying to sound fancy and important. Not to say I still find the 20% claim a little suspect.
      - tuukkah 2y ago
        You do realize it wasn't "saved us 20%" but "Hetzner can sometimes be as low as 20% of an equivalent AWS bill" ie saved 80%?
        stonogo 2y ago
        Might have been easier to read if it weren't buried in AI slop.
        supriyo-biswas 2y ago
        Ah, apologies.
    - 2y ago

deleted 2y ago

[deleted]

0xFF0123 2y ago

While I agree that your characterisation is true for a lot of chatgpt output, it can also be true for a human explaining their nuanced point of view.

ratg13 2y ago
Most humans don't say a couple sentences and then re-summarize them 3 more times unless they are speaking to someone with a learning disability.

tutfbhuf 2y ago

It is my ouput, but I use ChatGPT to fix my spelling and grammar. Maybe my prompt for that should be refined in order to not alter the wording too much.

redbell 2y ago
While using ChatGPT for enhancing your writings is not wrong by any means, reviewing the generated output and re-editing when necessary is essential to avoid robotic writing style that may smell unhuman. For instance, these successive paragraphs: "In contrast, using AWS.." and "In essence, with AWS.." leaves a bad taste in your brain when read consecutively.
- tutfbhuf 2y ago
  I agree with you, failed on that one
lproven 2y ago
> I use ChatGPT to fix my spelling and grammar I have a better suggestion, which will save time, energy, money, and human work. Don't. Write it yourself. If you can't, don't post.
- simtel20 2y ago
  Why would you want to restrict contributions from people with relevant experience and willingness to share, just because the author ran a spelling and grammar check?
  - supriyo-biswas 2y ago
    Everyone claims it’s a spelling and grammar check, but it’s the OP trying to spread “we tried running self-managed clusters on Hetzner and it only saved us 20% while being a chore in terms of upkeep” into a full essay that causes all that annoying filler. You’d assume people would use tools to deliver a better and well composed message; whereas most people try to use LLMs to decompress their text into an inefficient representation. Why this is I have no idea, but I’d rather have the raw unfiltered thought from a fellow human rather than someone trying to sound fancy and important. Not to say I still find the 20% claim a little suspect.
    - tuukkah 2y ago
      You do realize it wasn't "saved us 20%" but "Hetzner can sometimes be as low as 20% of an equivalent AWS bill" ie saved 80%?
      - stonogo 2y ago
        Might have been easier to read if it weren't buried in AI slop.
      - supriyo-biswas 2y ago
        Ah, apologies.
  - 2y ago