4 ms·
My point was how our most serious issues are with memory management that exists in popular type-strict languages and so type safety is not up there in importanc
by xcrunner529 2y ago
My point was how our most serious issues are with memory management that exists in popular type-strict languages and so type safety is not up there in importance compared to the biggest causes.
- quantadev 2y agoThat's exactly backwards. Without the type-safety in those memory-unsafe languages (like C++) there would be 100x more buffer overruns and other memory issues and security holes. Having the type-safety in place is literally the main thing that makes memory-unsafe languages viable.