2 ms·

I don't think there are enough entries to make it worth the cost of a hash. I know it's not "efficient" exactly, but just repeatedly looping through and countin

I don't think there are enough entries to make it worth the cost of a hash. I know it's not "efficient" exactly, but just repeatedly looping through and counting just isn't that slow.

9029 2y ago
The numbers are so small that you can also just use a big array