5 ms·
It’s actually surprisingly efficient if you batch writes at the expense of some added latency. The WarSyream team found that batching into chunks of either 4MB
by MadsRC 2y ago
It’s actually surprisingly efficient if you batch writes at the expense of some added latency. The WarSyream team found that batching into chunks of either 4MB of data or 250ms was optimal.
Downside is the 250ms latency. But then again, a fair amount of workloads can deal with 250ms of latency.
- rad_gruchalski 2y agoKafka does batch reading anyway. Have a look at the reader, it’s a loop with read and read timeout. Usually a 100ms per single loop iteration.