Honestly this does not compute > None of these "AI" tools have yet demonstrated the ability to classify "This is datapath", "This is array logic", "This is ran

Honestly this does not compute > None of these "AI" tools have yet demonstrated the ability to classify "This is datapath", "This is array logic", "This is random logic". Sounds like a good objective, one that could be added to training parameters. Or maybe it isn't needed (AI can 'understand' some concepts without explicitly tagging) > If I have the compute power to run EDA tools with a couple of different random seeds, at least one run will likely be a couple percentage points better. Then do it?! How long does it actually take to run? I know EDA tools creators are bad at some kinds of code optimization (and yes, it's hard) but let's say for a company like Intel, if it takes 10 days to rerun a chip to get 1% better, that sounds like a worthy tradeoff. > I put this snake oil in the same category as "financial advice"--if it worked, they wouldn't be sharing it and would simply be printing money by taking advantage of it. Yeah I don't think you understood the problem here. Good financial advice is about balancing risks and returns.