7 ms·

There's this one GitS (SAC I think) UI thing that I think about pretty often: a bot needs to work faster so its fingers pop open revealing a huge number of addi

• MrLeap 2y ago
  Think about it from an animator's point of view. What's more fun, plugging a cable in or typing your heart out? There's a whole dotted outline where I could put a plug for my indie game...
  • yjftsjthsd-h 2y ago
    I'm sure there's something to be said for the visual appeal, but I think they actually did justify it in universe as an isolation mechanism; physically using a keyboard means no BadUSB or such.
• discordance 2y ago
  That was in the original Ghost in the Shell (nswf): https://youtu.be/x-zUAb_ndDk https://youtu.be/x-zUAb_ndDk
  • GauntletWizard 2y ago
    The full movie is free on Youtube (In the US, anyway): https://youtu.be/iHil4Y4r3Wk https://youtu.be/iHil4Y4r3Wk And a link directly to that scene: https://youtu.be/iHil4Y4r3Wk?t=2748 https://youtu.be/iHil4Y4r3Wk?t=2748 and the other time they show it: https://youtu.be/iHil4Y4r3Wk?t=3297 https://youtu.be/iHil4Y4r3Wk?t=3297 Moreover, this almost makes sense as a security mechanism. A keyboard is a one-way input device; You don't get feedback from it. A monitor provides feedback that's fuzzy - Harder to exploit via a visual image where you're expecting and parsing text than a direct digital link.
    • kuschku 2y ago
      You can use opto-electronic isolators on a direct digital link as well. You could also just connect up to the computer via TOSLINK, that has no backchannel and no risk of interference either.
      • GauntletWizard 2y ago
        That's the "Almost" in almost makes sense :)
  • crabmusket 2y ago
    What's most shocking about that scene is not the typing speed, but being able to think of the code to write that quickly!
    • deleted 2y ago
      [deleted]
    • saagarjha 2y ago
      Clearly he's using ChatGPT.
• cbanek 2y ago
  I've always loved that scene in particular, I know exactly the one you're talking about.
• binary132 2y ago
  Presumably the cybernetic typing mechanism is for enhanced access to terminals not equipped for direct machine interface. :)
  • floydnoel 2y ago
    ... or as an interface to an actively hostile/compromised device!
• hombre_fatal 2y ago
  I've seen similar comments about that scene over the years but I don't get it. How is it naive? It's clearly creative license to be more interesting and provocative. They could have just made his eyes glow and stuff happen on screen, but that wouldn't have been as cool.
  • el_cujo 2y ago
    Yeah I think that kind of thing isn't supposed to be "predictive". The "rules" in series aren't very clear, sometimes they type stuff out into a keyboard, sometimes they connect a cable from their head, sometimes they just pass stuff around/hack basically just just "telepathically" without even needing the wire, they do whatever seems cool for a scene. I think the "splitting fingers" thing happens in one of the movies but also in SAC, but I think the point is just that it looks interesting and seeing the fingers do that and start suddenly typing quickly gives a sense of tension/urgency that you wouldn't get if it was just the character sitting back and staring at the screen (even if "in universe" they're able to work just as effectively that way)
    • Brian_K_White 2y ago
      Agreed the main reason is the point of the show is to be entertaining and visually interesting, and that is entertaining and visually interesting. Why do the robots look like spiders without any of the features of spiders that would actually be useful in a robot but look scary instead of cute to humans? It's not because it's a naive idea of what robots would look like. But even aside from the fact that visual style outweghs realism in this work, it's not weird or remarkable anyway. The robot has to type sometimes for the same reason you sometimes have to manually type a password into a keypad or your food order into a pos terminal even though you have a password manager in a phone with a dozen kinds of connectivity in it. None of your dozen forms of connectivity is compatible or available with any of the terminals dozen forms of connectivity. Even if you both have something the same plug, it doesn't mean you can use it. You may also choose to do your "adversarial interfacing" the manual way even if you had a direct option available and even if you desperately wanted speed, simply for safety.
  • 2y ago
• devjab 2y ago
  Maybe it’s just the artist way of acknowledging that nothing is ever going to be faster than VIM?
• gyomu 2y ago
  The goal of interfaces in the real world is to help people perform tasks quickly/efficiently, without error (and to easily recover when errors are made). The goal of interfaces depicted in movies/media is to look cool. (Sadly too many designers do not understand this)
  • wodenokoto 2y ago
    The line between “cool” and “ridiculous” isn’t always that broad. In order to look at this and think “wow, that’s so cool, now it can type super fast” I do I agree that you need some nativity to not think “why not just plug in?” Although, on second thought, maybe you need some pessimism and think “that’s a cool way to deal with incompatible ports and apis”
    • portaouflop 2y ago
      The character in the scene can’t plug in bc they don’t want to get the implant - it’s not explained in the anime tho
• keiferski 2y ago
  One of the key themes in GITS is the interaction between biological and computer systems. Those rapidly typing fingers are probably the perfect physical metaphor for exploring that idea: how one could maximize data transfer between a physical/biological input system and a computer one.
• notpushkin 2y ago
  There was a nice reference to that scene in the Pantheon series: an “uploaded” human (basically an emulated brain with a software human-based avatar) learns he can interact with other pieces of software directly, but can't put his mind to it yet. He does modify his avatars’ fingers in a GitS-like fashion, though, to everyone’s amusement. Pantheon (2022–2023): https://m.imdb.com/title/tt11680642/ https://m.imdb.com/title/tt11680642/
  • LoganDark 2y ago
    Was just about to mention this also. Pantheon is great! So many tech industry references and parodies...
    • aspenmayer 2y ago
      Pantheon is so underrated! If you’re a fan of GitS and/or Pantheon, I encourage you and anyone else to check out Psycho-Pass. It really blew me away. It manages to be at once a more gripping police procedural, like GitS, and especially like the spin-off series Stand Alone Complex, and it tries pretty hard to match the philosophical prescience of Pantheon. It also has a lot more humanity, without shying away from the psychological and cybernetic related weirdness that those series share. It also shares a production company with GitS in Production I.G. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psycho-Pass https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psycho-Pass
      • LoganDark 2y ago
        > Pantheon is so underrated! I think it recently came to Netflix, and quickly became extremely popular. Hopefully it won't be underrated for long! Just be aware that Netflix has only the first season of that series which actually already has two seasons, so look for the second season of Pantheon if you enjoyed the first season :) > I encourage you and anyone else to check out Psycho-Pass. It really blew me away. I also really enjoyed the parts of Psycho-Pass that I did watch. Thanks for reminding me that exists :)
        • 2y ago
• makeitdouble 2y ago
  I assume the naive part is that the keyboard polling interface probably doesn't allow that much input ? Otherwise yes, we do this kind of approach so much irl. The most useful kind is the Switch it's button actuator, that will just push a button when making it "smart" is just impossible or not worth it. The less useful kind is what the Rabbit R1 was trying to do, with website interaction automation in a full VM because each service wouldn't provide an API.
• lloeki 2y ago
  Not SAC, the original GitS movie. > I love thinking of this as such a wonderfully naive early 2000's view on HCI — there's no direct-access data API Even in original GitS, both cyborgs and bots have wired neck ports and can also communicate wirelessly, both subject to various kinds of attacks. Even if not intended, this typing may constitute a legit airgap defense.
  • amatecha 2y ago
    Wow, that's an angle I had absolutely not thought of before. Of course they "could" just jack right in, but that's probably forbidden -- the only permitted interface is the keyboard? Maybe? That's pretty intriguing!
    • lloeki 2y ago
      An analysis of the layout and usage of the so-called tera-keyboard: https://scifiinterfaces.com/2013/07/24/the-secret-of-the-tera-keyboard/ https://scifiinterfaces.com/2013/07/24/the-secret-of-the-ter... Worth a read, notably the estimated achieved speed in comparison with a human brain. I won't spoil you, but it allowing chords has... consequences. The article also asks how a human brain could process such interaction so fast; well in GITS canon cybernetised brains are augmented/enhanced beyond normal human abilities. The article also raises the question of why this and not a direct connection. I would yet again argue the possible security implications, notably in the context of the Puppet Master being around. But it could also be a gracefully degrading interface, and a less cybernetised person may still be able to operate it with normal hands, or even a non cybenetised one, albeit of course at a massively reduced speed. IOW ed is the standard text editor / it's a Unix system, I know this. After all, what better interface than text via stdin/out to scale from normal hands/eyeballs to max line rate? EDIT: the first comment actually raises both interop and security concerns!
• woolion 2y ago
  This hands thing, there's a literal note in the manga about it. The man is an old neuro-scientist, but new brain implants that allow for direct CPU connectivity is something that only young neuro-surgeons are familiar with. For this reason, this man doesn'n't want a man who could be his child to operate direcly on his brain. However, the productivity boost because of the brain implant creates a gap between humans and augmented humans, so this is the solution this man found to work around his refusal to get the brain implant, and so it is clear that it is a fairly bad solution that only exists because of this human "motivation". The two points are some of the major themes that are explored in depth. I would recommend reading Masamune Shirow's original work (it's only 2 volumes!), as you could argue that the adaptations are merely shells of the original. On the one hand, the Mamoru Oshii movie version is a 'best of' the cool moments from the original, but it bends the narrative very strongly to express Oshii's POV rather than Shirow's. It's not as bad as in people modernizing Tolkien for example, it's more in line with how Kubrick's version of "A Clockwork Orange" differs from Anthony Burgess' original (which I also recommmend reading). On the other hand, the SAC (Stand Alone Complex) series more closely match Shirow's POV and ambience, it's not as deep, but it's really an impressive feat considering it's all original scenarii, and how entertaining it is.
  • dleeftink 2y ago
    Thanks for the recommends!
  • portaouflop 2y ago
    Thanks for sharing that! imo the manga is often better the the anime adaption even if they replicate everything 1:1 A bit off topic but I found the text version of clockwork orange very hard to read and not nearly as entertaining as the movie - still an impressive piece of art.
  • jumpoddly 2y ago
    The original manga is great Worth noting that it is way more horny than the anime Also, love Kubricks adaptation of clockwork orange, but burgess hated it and caused him to hate his own original work later in life He even made a play with him and Kubrick as characters to talk about how much he hated the whole experience One major change was the ending, burgess’s original has 21 chapters, and in the 21st the main character rediscovers his humanity and seeks a life of creating art Kubrick stops his adaptation at the conclusion of chapter 20 Hilariously, the publisher behind the first US print of A Clockwork Orange removed the 21st chapter to make the novel more controversial so it would sell more If you read clockwork definitely make sure it is the full version with all 21 chapters!
• johnchristopher 2y ago
  In minority report there's a scene (https://youtu.be/NwVBzx0LMNQ?t=43 https://youtu.be/NwVBzx0LMNQ?t=43) in a forensic/detective office in which MC swipes data and info on the screen (hologram ?) with their hands. Then at some point another character moves a physical object (data drive ?) from one desk to another and at first I am thinking "yeah, right.. no network to move data from one screen to the other, uh ?". But then I remind myself of this passage from Virtual lights (Gibson): > Was it significant that Skinner shared his dwelling with one who earned her living at the archaic intersection of information and geography? The offices the girl rode between were electronically conterminous-in effect, a single desktop, the map of distances obliterated by the seamless and instantaneous nature of communication. > Yet this very seamlessness, which had rendered physical mail an expensive novelty, might as easily be viewed as porosity, and as such created the need for the service the girl provided. Physically transporting bits of information about a grid that consisted of little else, she provided a degree of absolute security in the fluid universe of data. > With your memo in the girl's bag, you knew precisely where it was; otherwise, your memo was nowhere, perhaps everywhere, in that instant of transit.
• pavlov 2y ago
  On the Enterprise-D in “Star Trek: The Next Generation”, they don’t have WiFi or any other kind of local wireless except for voice calls. So when the android Data needs to access some information, he reads it from a GUI terminal, but at 1000x speed. (It seems like the iPad-like touchscreen tablets don’t have WiFi either because they are frequently used to “sneakernet” information inside the ship.)
• gwern 2y ago
  > I love thinking of this as such a wonderfully naive early 2000's view on HCI Not really so naive when you look into 'robotic process automation' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robotic_process_automation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robotic_process_automation . Huge industry, and can be just moving a mouse around on a screen and triggering keyboard inputs. If robot hands were cheap and dexterous enough...