3 ms·
There's also all the (potentially relevant) factors no one's considering - https://www.thetransmitter.org/methods/mouse-housing-temperatures-can-cook-experiment
by domofutu 2y ago
There's also all the (potentially relevant) factors no one's considering - https://www.thetransmitter.org/methods/mouse-housing-temperatures-can-cook-experimental-outcomes/ https://www.thetransmitter.org/methods/mouse-housing-tempera...
- aaron695 2y agoA bunch of women going on about giving mice air-conditioning or not? Probably. We've filled science with Imposters. It seems predominantly women, they are the largest change in science. The worst non-replicable sciences are also female majority. Busywork on mice conditions is exactly the false science we are talking about. More excuse why it's not reproducible when mice are mice and are great sub-ins for humans. "In mice" is the meme create to excuse the garbage that's produced. The studies never originally worked on mice, but now they have an excuse why they don't work on humans. I wouldn't necessarily blame it 100% on women though. But I see your point.