That's a decent point. With the case in question here, any idea if the place doing the copyright trolling was attempting to make sure the notices were backed b

That's a decent point. With the case in question here, any idea if the place doing the copyright trolling was attempting to make sure the notices were backed by court worthy evidence? My understanding is that such a thing isn't even possible, thus the notices being literally useless if a court ever decided to consider them properly.