4 ms·
There should really be some repercussion against clickbait titles. There is nothing newly "uncovered" here. The actual scientific paper title is "Making sense
by openrisk 2y ago
There should really be some repercussion against clickbait titles.
There is nothing newly "uncovered" here. The actual scientific paper title is "Making sense of eastern Asian Late Quaternary hominin variability". [1] It may be a very important rethinking of early hominid families, but it has not "uncovered" anything.
In the end of the day clickbait is like spam. Degrades our communication channels, wastes time and energy. We should create mechanisms where the polluter pays, so they have to think twice before they do so.
[1] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-53918-7 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-53918-7
- b800h 2y agoYes, I smelled a rat when the article said "the new group includes the Denisovans".
- metalman 2y agoI couldn't agree more heartily. Though I have to thank/apologise/admit that I read the comments here,preferentialy, to the actual articles as the caliber is almost always higher than whatever is published.Plus it saves me seeing paywalls, and needing to enable java/cookies,dom, or switch to megadvertizemento birage-o-browser text,blessed text