5 ms·
Legally, you cannot name the llama3 based models like that, YOu have to use, llama in the name https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct/blob/
by tanakai24 2y ago
Legally, you cannot name the llama3 based models like that,
YOu have to use, llama in the name
https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct/blob/main/LICENSE https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct/blo...
- alexvitkov 2y agoToo bad :) Facebook trained the model on an Internet's worth of copyrighted material without any regard for licenses whatsoever - even if model weights are copyrightable, which is an open question, you're doing the exact same thing they did. Probably not a bulletproof legal defense though.
- tourmalinetaco 2y agoAt least Zuck had the decency to release model weights, unlike these worthless clowns.
- littlestymaar 2y agoCan't wait until Meta sue them so we can have a judgment on whether or not models weights are subject to copyright.
- euroderf 2y agoModel weights are (abstractly speaking) a very intensive, concentrated form of website scraping, yes ? What does the (USA) law say about scraping ? Does "fair use" play a role ?
- ranger_danger 2y agoYes, and there have already been court cases that ruled AI training of copyrighted data to be fair use, because it's technically no different than any other form of art, everything is based off of seeing other ideas elsewhere, there are no new ideas anymore.