4 ms·
> Is that new? It's neither new nor novel. Even GitHub allows anyone to post a commit on a feature branch, regardless of who created it. It's not a GitLab or
by chipdart 2y ago
> Is that new?
It's neither new nor novel. Even GitHub allows anyone to post a commit on a feature branch, regardless of who created it.
It's not a GitLab or GitHub feature. It's a Git feature: the ability to post a commit to a branch.
- bdangubic 2y agocreate alias dont-fuck-with-my-branch git reset --hard HEAD~1 git push -f :)
- chipdart 2y agoServices like GitHub and GitLab support preventing changes that overwrite a repo's history, in addition to tracking history even when you force update a branch.
- bdangubic 2y agoI was just joking but surely I can revert a commit on a feature branch, no?
- chipdart 2y agoYou can revert and even force-update the branch to rewrite it's history, but GitHub still tracks the old commits and even lists in the PR the events that rewrote the branch history.
- bdangubic 2y agosorry for misunderstanding, I am NOT trying to hide the fact I reverted, hence the alias dont-fuck-with-my-branch :) and I was overall just joking…
- Anon1096 2y agoI'm not sure about gitlab, but on github this is a distinct feature where you post a comment wrapped in three backticks and the language as suggestion. It'll format it as a diff that the author can one-click create a commit from. https://github.blog/news-insights/product-news/suggested-changes-update/ https://github.blog/news-insights/product-news/suggested-cha...