I viewed the full interview. He doesn't fully mention the type of founders who have been "debanked," but he vaguely talks about it. They seem to have been invol

I viewed the full interview. He doesn't fully mention the type of founders who have been "debanked," but he vaguely talks about it. They seem to have been involved in the pot and crypto businesses. These industries operate on the fringes; pot businesses aren't legal at the federal level, and crypto is still new and fraught with fraud. He's presenting a hazy view, playing the victim without providing all the facts. Also, his fight should be with Congress, which has the power to legalize pot and crypto at the federal level. He's only giving a very vague one side of the story.