3 ms·
> so the word doesn't lose all meaning in the future The English language doesn’t have a central body that decides what words get to exist, and what they mean,
by oarsinsync 2y ago
> so the word doesn't lose all meaning in the future
The English language doesn’t have a central body that decides what words get to exist, and what they mean, like e.g. the French.
English dictionaries are descriptive, not prescriptive. The definitions are defined by popular culture, rather than a central body.
What is needed is a large enough mass of people to recognise a word as having a particular definition, in order to change/add that definition. See “literally” having a definition of “for emphasis, not literally” as a prime example of the wisdom of crowds.
- diggan 2y agoRight, I don't think my complaint is "Why isn't there a central body that defines words?" but rather "Why are we letting Meta propagate the idea that something we cannot re-create ourselves, can possibly be Open Source?" and I guess the implication is that I'm complaining about us letting Meta change the definition by popular culture, to use your words.