2 ms·
Employment is at-will. It's better to just fire without the PIP drama. As it is, a PIP does not provide legal cover if the employee writes back, effectively rej
by OutOfHere 2y ago
Employment is at-will. It's better to just fire without the PIP drama. As it is, a PIP does not provide legal cover if the employee writes back, effectively rejecting it.
- KerrAvon 2y agoIANAL, but I don’t think this is correct
- outside1234 2y agoEmployment is at-will but you can’t fire someone for non-work reasons. The PIP is there to collect the data that they are firing someone for work reasons.
- OutOfHere 2y agoWho said anything about firing for non-work reasons. One can be fired immediately for work reasons without a PIP. Note that the PIP alone does not suffice as valid supporting data if the employee contests it. It helps for there to be more data than it.
- 3eb7988a1663 2y agoMaybe I need my understanding corrected. I thought the point of at-will was that you very much could fire someone for nearly reason (you support the Cubs, pack up your desk!). You cannot fire someone for protected classes (gender, race, etc), but basically everything else is fair game.
- triceratops 2y agoIf it's extensively documented, the fired employee could always allege they were fired for a protected reason.