3 ms·
That's what I thought too, but why does the article say: > Infringement suits require that relevant works were first registered with the U.S. Copyright Office
by dataflow 2y ago
That's what I thought too, but why does the article say:
> Infringement suits require that relevant works were first registered with the U.S. Copyright Office (USCO).
- throw646577 2y agoOK so it turns out I am wrong here! Cool. I have it upside down/diametrically wrong, however you see fit. Right that structures exist, exactly wrong on how they apply. It is registration that guarantees access to statutory damages: https://www.justia.com/intellectual-property/copyright/infringement/damages-in-copyright-infringement-cases/ https://www.justia.com/intellectual-property/copyright/infri... Without registration you still have your natural copyright, but you would have to try to recover the profits made by the infringer. Which does sound like more of an uphill struggle for The Intercept, because OpenAI could maybe just say "anything we earn from this is de minimis considering how much errr similar material is errrr in the training set" Oh man it's going to take a long time for me to get my brain to accept this truth over what I'd always understood.
- zerocrates 2y agoYou have to register to sue, but you have the copyright automatically at the moment the work is created. You can go register after an infringement and still sue, but you then won't be able to get statutory damages or attorney's fees. Statutory damages are a big deal in general but especially here where proving how much of OpenAI's revenue is due to your specific articles is probably impossible. Which is why they're suing under this DMCA provision: it's not an infringement suit so the registration requirement doesn't apply, and there's a separate statutory damages provision for it.