4 ms·
Photoshop's UX is poor, but everyone is used to it. GIMP's UX is even worse, and nobody is used to it. And based on those screenshots in the article, it has, if
by cameronh90 2y ago
Photoshop's UX is poor, but everyone is used to it. GIMP's UX is even worse, and nobody is used to it. And based on those screenshots in the article, it has, if anything, got even weirder and less intuitive.
I'd probably try and power through if there was even close to feature parity, but it's only just now catching up with where Photoshop was in 1994.
- KaiserPro 2y agoGimp's UX was ok in 0.9, same with photoshop. GIMP was meant to be a drop in replacement for early photoshop, so it makes sense that it follows that UX idea.